Covid-19 and SRA Approach to Compliance.

The SRA has at last issued a brief statement on this very significant issue. I suspect the virus has massively impacted on the Authority and I know many employees are working from home. It is not business as usual and of course, it is not business as usual for pretty well every law firm.

The SRA has said it will be pragmatic and proportionate and expects solicitors and firms to continue to meet the high standards the public expect. It expects law firms to have had contingency plans in place to cover disruption, but by any standards what has happened over two short weeks was both massive and totally unpredictable. No one would have had a plan in place to cover this. The events may well be terminal for some firms and the regulator will need to be sensitive.

Nonetheless, SRA expects firms to do everything they reasonably can to comply with rules and Principles, and no one would seriously argue with that. As lawyers, we all want to continue to serve the best interests of our clients and to behave properly. Rightly SRA will focus on those who are making little or no effort to do the right thing. The vast majority of us will make every effort to act correctly.

It remains to be seen what pragmatic and proportionate means in practice. Of course, we won’t know that for weeks if not months, as the implications of any breaches emerge in investigations. In the immediate term, it has to recognise that investigation interviews should not take place. They can be done in writing or video conferencing if really pressing. I have heard anecdotally that as recently as last week Investigation Officers were looking to set up interviews, but that will now stop. Even investigations conducted in writing may be difficult if records and documents are not as readily available as they would otherwise have been. Attendances at the firm’s offices will need to be reconsidered, and it is to be hoped there will be real flexibility over deadlines. SRA invariably imposes dates to respond to investigatory letters and it is going to be tough for quite a while to meet these. This will apply to firms which have closed their offices and arranged for everyone to work remotely from home.

I would like to think that when dealing with regulatory breaches SRA will not only be proportionate and pragmatic, but realistic. It would be wonderful if all compliance breaches and challenges could be identified and documented for an audit trail, but it may just not be possible and this is where realism will be needed. Many employers and employees will be worrying about their businesses, jobs and homes, as well as their health and possibly even their lives. The regulator will indeed need to be proportionate, pragmatic and above all else realistic.

I provide practical and realistic advice to solicitors and their firms and have been doing so for many years. You can contact me through this site. Even if I am taking my daily outside exercise allowance.


No comments so far - why not be the first?

(HTML markup not supported)
Solicitors public vs personal life. Ryan Beckwith v SRA 2020] EWHC 3231 (Admin), The SRA has said it will not appeal,
The article below was printed in the Law Society Gazette and prompted quite a discussion! In September 2018 I described how the SRA were dealing with solicitors convicted of drink driving, and the need for a more discerning and informed
A much simpler set of Accounts Rules will come into force in November 2019, and will for the first time give firms, managers and sole practitioners considerable flexibility on how they go about complying and dealing with client money.
The Leigh Day appeal reaffirmed some basic principles for appeals of SRA judgements
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal regularly deals with applications brought by the SRA following the conclusion of criminal proceedings against solicitors. The conviction sometimes forms the entire basis of the proceedings, but otherwise
In late 2013 Aidan Loy committed three drink driving offences for which he was sentenced in December 2013 and February 2014. The second two offences were dealt with together, and as they were all committed in a very short period of time with
The recently published judgment in Forz Khan v Bar Standards Board provides insight into the professional consequences of careless talk and use of LinkedIn. It comes hot on the heels of an SDT judgment in Deborah Daniels who was prosecuted by
LawCare released striking statistics at the beginning of 2018 which show the number of lawyers calling for help is increasing. Lawyers' mental and emotional health has been slowly creeping up the agenda and even the SRA is recognising
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal is now consulting on whether to reduce the standard of proof in disciplinary cases from a criminal to a civil one.
Solicitors have been warned to watch their language and it is highly likely that other regulators will adopt a similar approach.
Solicitors and firms are required to report to the SRA promptly, serious misconduct but what constitutes serious misconduct
The SRA and other regulators frequently bring disciplinary proceedings based on "a lack of integrity." But what is integrity?
In September 2017 Majid Mahmood was fined £25,000 and was the subject of a deferred period of suspension as a result of wholly inappropriate posts on his Facebook Page
On the 21 September 2017 the SRA published a warning notice to solicitors, firms and anyone else it regulates who provide tax planning services
There is a procedure in the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal which allows the parties to apply for disciplinary proceedings to be concluded by a Statement of Agreed Facts and Outcome.
Michael Cremin was a man who presented himself to the outside world as a Lawyer and Advocate. He had a professional profile on the web site of Cotswold Barristers Chambers, along with his photograph. Cremin was neither.
This has long been a guiding principle. Solicitors are guardians and trustees of client money and are expected to exercise proper stewardship over it. Everything that we do with client money has to in accordance with the SRA Accounts Rules
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal has confirmed that it will consult on where to set the standard of proof when determining allegations of misconduct against solicitors. The Bar Standards Board is also looking at a new civil standard of
In proceedings before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal it has for very many years been a requirement that a solicitor should clearly know the case that he or she has to meet. In other words, there is an obligation on the SRA to properly
The need to deal carefully, thoroughly and openly with the SRA during investigations cannot be overstated. There is an explicit professional obligation to cooperate with the Authority and to provide it with whatever information it might need
Web site powered by CommsBox™